Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Spanish FIA figure Joaquín Verdegay has slammed the severe penalty issued to Fernando Alonso at the Australian Grand Prix, while claiming a lack of consistency in decisions.
Alonso had been attempting to defend P6 from Mercedes’ George Russell in the final stages of the race at Albert Park, though a dramatic shunt for Russell saw Alonso hit with a drive-through penalty, converted to 20 seconds, plus three points on his FIA Super Licence.
Spanish FIA figure does not agree with Fernando Alonso punishment
After Alonso braked earlier than he had been previously doing so for Turn 6, the speed differential caught Russell out as he lost control of his Mercedes and slammed into the barriers, coming to a stop sideways in the middle of the track. Alonso pinned that on “battery or deployment” issues, but the FIA stewards were having none of it.
Instead, they found Alonso guilty of “potentially dangerous driving” and came down hard on him for it, which Verdegay, vice president of the FIA-affiliated Royal Spanish Automobile Federation, believes went too far.
“If regulating a sport is usually complex, regulating motor racing is tremendously complex,” Verdegay told Soymotor.com.
“And, unfortunately, the line that separates legality from illegality has so many nuances that it is particularly difficult to know where you are and which rule to apply at any given moment.
“This sport is particularly complicated and situations like this one show it.
READ MORE:Martin Brundle scoffs at Fernando Alonso’s ‘saintly halo’ after ‘same playbook’ at
“The problem is that at the end of the season, apparently identical events end up being penalised radically differently, unjustly different. Either because they have been exaggeratedly soft with one or exaggeratedly hard with the other, because the same thing, logically, should be punished with the same penalty.
“If I read the report of the stewards who imposed it, what I have just said would change and my disagreement would only be from a technical legal point of view. Why? Because the stewards have had on the table and have analysed the telemetry of Russell and Alonso’s car, they have spoken to both drivers, they have spoken to witnesses…. They have had a lot of elements of judgment and their opinion is more formed.
“The stewards’ ruling states that Alonso is entitled to ‘try a different approach to the corners’. Something he is entitled to do in order to make it more difficult for the chaser to overtake.
“The ruling also states that Alonso is not responsible for the dirty air that caused Russell’s accident. The dirty air whether Alonso was braking or not is something he cannot avoid.
